Just last week, a shocking video appeared on social media that reminds us of what we are able to actually do for nature.
Thailand’s bucket list Maya Bay implemented a restriction policy as the positioning was now not open to tourists. Maya Bay became a favourite destination for tourists due to the 2000 film “The Beach” starring Leonardo DiCaprio.
This policy has been implemented since October and shall be closed for 3 months until normalcy returns. The Department of National Parks, Nature and Plant Protection said the bay needed more time to get better.
Since Maya Bay has been closed indefinitely, the impact on wildlife has been incredible, with waters becoming clear and black tip reef sharks returning. To sum up, nature is beginning to regenerate.
As we are able to see within the video showing the results of tourism restrictions, one query arises, should this policy even be implemented in lots of places to support sustainable tourism and nature recovery after the destruction of many beaches and bays as a consequence of tourists?
If we talk in regards to the problem of tourists, we are able to speak about how serious the damage to nature is. Garbage and coral reefs which have also been destroyed by tourists.
Yes, there may be lots of garbage and trash thrown away irresponsibly, and lots of coral reefs have been damaged because tourists didn’t know find out how to enjoy them without damaging them.
If we glance from the attitude of tourists, they need to definitely go on vacation and see nature. However, if a tourist site begins to exceed capability, there shall be an issue. On the opposite hand, nature also must regenerate.
When talking in regards to the advantages of tourists coming to 1 place, similar to Maya Bay, tourists obviously make an enormous contribution to the economy. However, we must bear in mind that some tourists also destroy nature.
The above video is a giant slap within the face each for some tourists and a few tourism managers who don’t know about nature.
Coming back to the query: “should the actions taken by the Thai government to restore nature be implemented in some places?”
To answer this query, perhaps we could have three solutions with some condition,
FirstNO, we wouldn’t have to follow the restriction policy if… and BIG IF…we are able to cope with this very well by making strict laws/regulations with penalties. For example, garbage, people should throw the rubbish they create into the trash, and people who don’t do it receive a penalty or a heavy tremendous. To support this principle, there have to be multiple waste bins in every corner.
Sounds easy, right? But implementation won’t be that easy since the “throw away trash wherever you’ll be able to” behavior remains to be embedded in personal behavior. People will get really offended after they are punished and can deny it, claiming of their defense “numerous people do the identical thing.”
Second, YES, if we would like to reclaim nature with all our hearts. But there shall be people against it due to the economic factor. Their income and lives depend upon tourists who come and buy their products or use their services.
The same thing happens in our on a regular basis life: on the one hand, we hate it when someone cuts down our trees, and on the opposite, we waste lots of tissues and papers. On the one hand, we hate plastic waste that destroys the environment, but however, we still use plastic straws and plastic bags irresponsibly.
Third, MAYBE we are able to open the travel site at some times and shut it at others. For example, a tourist facility could also be open in January–March, then closed from April–June, then reopened in July–September, and closed again in October–December. So that nature has 3 months to regenerate.
After all, we’re accountable for balancing our nature. On the opposite hand, we’re destroying nature. So if we would like our youngsters and grandchildren to have the ability to see and revel in what we have now enjoyed on this world, we must act responsibly. Because if we proceed to destroy nature, our generation can have nothing left.
source :
