Politics

Move Forward’s hopes of leading the Thai government were dashed when the court rejected its appeal

ThailandOn Wednesday, the Constitutional Tribunal rejected the request of the winning Forward Movement party to reconsider the parliament’s decision that prevented the renomination of its candidate for prime minister.

The move all but kills any hopes of a progressive Move Forward initiative leading the following government and paves the way in which for lawmakers to carry one other vote on the prime minister later this week.

Thailand was under a caretaker government for five months, its largest parties in parliament have been unable to form a government after Pita Limjaroenrat, leader of the anti-system Move Forward party, was rejected appointed prime minister by lawmakers allied with the royalist military.

In its decision, the court stated that it refused to just accept the case since it was brought by a bunch of over 20 people, which didn’t include the candidate for prime minister himself.

“Their rights were not violated and they had no right to file a complaint,” the unanimous decision said of the petitioners.

Allies of Move Forward has asked the court to rule on the legality of lawmakers’ July 19 decision barring Pita from being renominated as prime minister after failing in his first attempt.

‘I won’t drink it’: How a Thai drink became so politically polarizing

Thailand’s parliament will convene on August 22 to vote on a brand new prime minister, Speaker of the House of Representatives Wan Muhamad Noor Matha told reporters on Wednesday.

The vote will happen on the candidacy of a businessman and political neophyte for prime minister Srettha Thavisinthe second-ranking Pheu Thai Party.

Move Forward won the May election because of overwhelming youth and concrete support for its liberal political platform, posing a threat to the military’s business monopolies and political power.

But efforts to form a government have did not garner sufficient support, with widespread opposition to a plan to vary the law geared toward shielding the monarchy from criticism.

admin
the authoradmin

Leave a Reply